Dunaway v. Torline
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.:
This action to recover under the Price Control Act, (Sec. 205 of United States Public Laws, passed by Eightieth Congress) because of an alleged rental charge in excess of the maximum fixed under Section 204 of that Act, was begun by George Dunaway and Dolores Dunaway. There have been two trials, resulting in each instance in a verdict against the defendants.
At the first trial, it developed that George Dunaway was a minor at the time the action was filed and at the time of trial. Inasmuch as George, Dunaway had not acted through a next friend or guardian ad litem, the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Payton v. RehbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Huff v. SpruanceFayette County Court of Common Pleas · 1953
- Winwood v. SturgeonOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Hunt v. Rohrbaugh Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1960
- Wright v. YoukilisOhio Court of Appeals · 1952