Ballard v. Harmon

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Any reversal of the judgment confirming the sale would, to all intents and purposes, destroy the force and effect of the final decree ordering the sale, and vice versa, and therefore the question involved in each bill of exceptions applies with equal force to the other. The question, therefore, is whether the insurance company as intervenor has any interest in sustaining the decrees as rendered. If the auditor and the judge were wrong in .treating the equity in the land as a partnership asset, and administering it as such, then…