Legal Opinion

Noakes v. Lattavo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1944No. Appeals, 109 and 110PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The tribunal to decide this case was the jury and its verdict, save for the reduction hereinafter made, must be upheld, for in no other respect do we find in the record any error which would justify this court in sustaining defendants’ appeals.

Plaintiff was employed by the Union Railroad Company as a brakeman. In the early evening of November 15, 1940, he was working on a train which was being operated within the plant of the Irwin Works of the Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation. Across the mill property ran a 20 foot wide macadam road intersected at right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Nevin Bus Line, Inc. v. Paul R. Hostetter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hutchison v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API