Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 8, 1974No. 19896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice:

The troublesome question on this appeal is whether the Business License Ordinance of the City of Spartanburg imposed a palpably unreasonable and irrational tax on the appellant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and others of its class, for the privilege of writing fire and casualty insurance in the City in 1971 and 1972, thus depriving appellant of equal protection of the law. In appellant’s action to recover license taxes for these years paid under protest, the circuit court sustained the validity of the ordinance.

The following comparison between the tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pacific Express Co. v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Aetna Insurance Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Charleston Land Corp. v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API