Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStearns, C. J.
Each of these suits is an action of debt on judgment °brought against the defendant under Sec. 7, Chap. 258, G. L. 1923, which provides that an injured party, after having obtained judgment against a party insured against liability for property damage or personal injuries, may proceed on said judgment against the insurance company in a separate action. Three of the judgments were obtained by the plaintiffs in the United States District Court and the fourth was obtained in the State court against the Providence-Worcester Coach Line, Inc. (hereinafter called the Providence Company). The issue…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crowell v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Commercial Union Assur. Co. of London v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanley v. American Motorist InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Bennett Chevrolet Co. v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Maringer v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Miller v. the Met. Cas. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
- Allen v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.