Legal Opinion

Jackson v. City National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890No. 14,476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

— The appellee sued the appellants upon a promissory note, dated May 6th, 1887, due on June 23d, 1887, for fifteen hundred dollars, with eight per cent, interest, and payable at the City National Bank of Goshen, Indiana.

The appellant Amos C. Jackson filed a separate answer in one paragraph, in substance, as follows: He admitted the execution of the note to'the City National Bank, as alleged in the complaint, but averred that on November 7th, 1887, he borrowed the money represented by said note of and from the said plaintiff, and executed his note therefor, with his co-defendant as surety, due…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Wright v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bickel v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Webber v. DonnellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Cummings v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Dovetail Body & Gear Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Singleton v. Bank of MonticelloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Futch v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Plank v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Kipp v. WelshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API