State v. Letalien
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1ConcurrenceSilver, J.
[¶ 65] I concur in the result but I conclude that the Maine Constitution provides a higher level of protection against ex post facto laws than the United States Constitution.18 I therefore believe that *27the Court’s decision should be based on the Maine Constitution, independent of the United States Constitution. I also conclude that some of the additional registration burdens promote retribution and deterrence, are excessive, and impose a stigma, and should be held unconstitutional under Maine’s ex post facto clause on these additional grounds.
I. THE MAINE CONSTITUTION
[¶ 66] The Maine…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.