McKinney v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWetherell, J.
Appellant contends that his convictions and sentences for third-degree murder and fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer causing death (hereafter “fleeing or eluding”) violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy because, even though the offenses contain different elements, he is being punished twice for the death of a single victim. We affirm because we conclude that fleeing or eluding is not a homicide offense and, thus, double jeopardy does not bar Appellant’s convictions and sentences for both felony murder and the underlying felony of fleeing or eluding.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Houser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. EnmundSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCullough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- R.J.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Kenneth T. Linton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Lott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- BABROW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.