Pasquinelli v. Gross
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 83, April T., 1920, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Allegheny County, January T., 1920, No. 860, making absolute rule to show cause of action and to show cause why attachment should not be dissolved in the case of G. Pasquinelli v. Alexander J. Gross and Felix Gross, partners, trading as Ignatius Gross Company. Rule to quash or dissolve foreign attachment.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 83, April T., 1920, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Allegheny County, January T., 1920, No. 860, making absolute rule to show cause of action and to show cause why attachment should not be dissolved in the case of G. Pasquinelli v. Alexander J. Gross and Felix Gross, partners, trading as Ignatius Gross Company. Rule to quash or dissolve foreign attachment. Before Shafer, P. J. The facts are stated in the following opinion of the court below: This rule was made absolute on the argument list December 15, 1919. The plaintiff having taken an appeal, we are now requested by him to…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The opinion filed by President Judge Shafeb so clearly demonstrates the correctness of the conclusion reached by the court below that further discussion of the question involved is not necessary.
The judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Marano v. GranataSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- McCloskey v. Northdale Woolen MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Marano v. Granata (Hankin)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Yount v. McKennaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.