Legal Opinion

De Jarnett v. Roseborough

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1968No. Gen. 50,664PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

Defendant appeals from vacatur of an order dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action for want of prosecution.

This action arose as a result of an automobile collision. Plaintiff sued for damages to his vehicle in the sum of $734.67. Defendant filed his answer and the cause was set for trial on November 16, 1964. Subsequently, the court entered orders “by agreement of the parties” continuing the case for trial until November 30, 1964, and to January 11, 1965. After another continuance by agreement to January 25, 1965, the court, on that date, entered an order dismissing the cause for want of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brockmeyer v. DuncanIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Grizzard v. Matthew ChevroletAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Maierhofer v. GerhardtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Gundersen v. Rainbow Cleaners & Laundry, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Windmon v. BanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Smith v. PappasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. M.L.C. Corp. v. PallasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Carroll & Neiman, Inc. v. SilvermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Commercial National Bank v. MehtaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API