S.D. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION ON REHEARING
FARMER, J.
We grant defendant’s motion for clarification and amend our original opinion as follows. We deny the other motions.
Defendant complains on appeal that he was denied his speedy trial rights under rule 3.191(h) when the State failed to bring him to an adjudicatory hearing within the 10 day period following a hearing on his motion for discharge. We affirm the disposition.
We think the issue is controlled by State v. Salzero, 714 So.2d 445 (Fla.1998), where the same argument was made about the same provision in rule 3.191(p)(3). Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.191(p)(3).…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SalzeroSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- State v. C.A.J.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. D.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. D.O.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- State v. DADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006