Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Jerry Arnold Westrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 2024No. A221679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-1679 Hennepin County Hudson, C.J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: May 8, 2024 Office of Appellate Courts Jerry Arnold Westrom, Appellant. ________________________ Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Mary F. Moriarty, Hennepin County Attorney, Adam E. Petras, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. Eric J. Nelson, Halberg Criminal Defense, Bloomington, Minnesota, for appellant. ________________________ SYLLABUS 1. The district court did not err in concluding that the genetic analysis of a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  2. State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-SanchezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  3. State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton EngelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  4. State of Minnesota, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock, Respondent/Cross-AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API