Doe on the demise of Murphy v. Hayes
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
The case was submitted to the Court; finding and judgment for the lessees^ of the plaintiff.
It appears from an agreed state of facts, that on the 27th of August, 1841, Jesse Scott, recovered judgment, by confession, for 200 dollars, on a note dated June 18,1840, against Lockhart and others. At the time of the recovery, Lockhart was the owner in fee of the land in controversy. On the 5th of. August, 1842, a fi. fa. issued on the judgment, was levied on the tract of land in question, as the property of Lockhart, and was returned without sale, by order of the plaintiff, Scott. In March, 1844, an…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doe v. HeathIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Murray v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kellogg v. ToutIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Egbert v. MercerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879