Quirk v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

BLAND,. J.

— Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for loss of services, medical attention and other damages suffered by.him on account of an injury to his son, Charles Quirk. The latter while attempting to get off of one of defendant’s cars on July 4, 1910, fell from the front step thereof, his leg going under the the car causing the same to be cut off about sis inches below the knee.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as those in the case of Charles Quirk, by next friend, Maurice Quirk v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, No. 13116, decided at this sitting but not yet…