Legal Opinion
United States v. Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1952PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
We now approach the task of formulating a final decree designed to prevent and restrain the violations of law which we have found. 15 U.S.C.A. § 4.
Our objective is to fashion, in the terms of a decree, means by which the agreement found to exist is terminated, its revival prevented and its effects destroyed by the reestablishment of competitive conditions insofar as they pertain to United States exports and imports. The decree must be based upon the facts as we have found them, and designed to be carried out with a minimum of judicial supervision and control of the future…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.