Legal Opinion

Metaxas v. J. R. Jarrell Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 1, 1933No. [No. 76, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

The J. R. Jarrell Company and the Easton Publishing' Company, bodies corporate, owners of adjoining properties in Easton, Md., each filed a bill of complaint in August, 1926, against Peter Metaxas, John Grouzes, and J. Russell Summers, the appellants. Each of these bills alleged that the defendant J. Russell Summers, a contractor and builder, obtained for the other defendants, owners of property adjacent to the property of the J. R. Jarrell Company on the north, a building permit from the mayor and city council of Easton to erect a building on a strip of land, described in the bill as an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  3. Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Barry v. EdlavitchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  5. Waters v. SnoufferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Potomac Edison Co. v. RoutzahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Canter v. PurseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API