Mendola v. Sambol
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Argued November 17, 1949. The minor-plaintiff, a seven-year-old child, suffered serious injury from a gunshot wound. The jury found that the injury was the proximate result of the defendant's negligence and awarded damages in favor of the child's parents to compensate them for hospital and medical expense incurred, and, in a second verdict against the defendant, made an allowance to the minor for pain and suffering. The lower court properly refused to enter judgments in favor of the defendant n. o. v. under the circumstances.
The verdicts establish these facts: Defendant had a .22 caliber…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Condel v. SavoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Archibald v. JewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Loughlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Wassel Et Ux. v. LudwigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Fleming v. KravitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Ellis v. D'AngeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rubin v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Christiansen v. SilfiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- K-Mart Enterprises of Fla., Inc. v. KellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.