Legal Opinion

Chacko v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 27, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01837Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RUBY CHACKO, No. 2:19-cv-01837-JAM-DB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 15 AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION NO. 3, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Before this Court is Plaintiff’s request for 19 reconsideration, (“Mot.”) ECF No. 32, of the Magistrate Judge’s 20 ruling granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s motion to 21 compel, March 16, 2020 Order (“Order”), ECF No. 29. Plaintiff 22 requests that the Court overrule the Magistrate Judge’s findings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Day v. AT & T Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Wilcox v. Wells Fargo & Co. Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API