Legal Opinion

Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 2, 1967No. C.D. 3076Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The suits listed iu schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise marked “A” and checked WPK (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner W. P. Kerley (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protests enumerated in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made part hereof, assessed with duty at 50% ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1301, Tariff Act of 1930, consists of nylon monofilament yarn, the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API