Friedly v. Giddings
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs own a marble mill operated by steam, and a quarry connected with it; the realty being worth upwards of $100,000, and the personalty upwards of $40,000, clear of incumbrance. The defendant Giddings, as constable, had a writ of attachment of $12,000 against one of them. He took possession of the mill, nailed up the doors, and left the plaintiffs’ superintendent in charge as keeper. The superintendent sent a resignation as keeper to Giddings, and started up the mill. Giddings got the defendant- Wilson, who was sheriff of the county, to assist him, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Earl v. TupperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
- Hodge v. Town of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
- Gage v. BarnesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
- Harris v. HaynesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norman Lumber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Mobile Building & Loan Ass'n v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Gerlach Live Stock Co. v. LaxaltNevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Becker-Franz Co. v. Shannon Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Ex parte CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907