Legal Opinion

Friedly v. Giddings

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont

Decided December 9, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

The plaintiffs own a marble mill operated by steam, and a quarry connected with it; the realty being worth upwards of $100,000, and the personalty upwards of $40,000, clear of incumbrance. The defendant Giddings, as constable, had a writ of attachment of $12,000 against one of them. He took possession of the mill, nailed up the doors, and left the plaintiffs’ superintendent in charge as keeper. The superintendent sent a resignation as keeper to Giddings, and started up the mill. Giddings got the defendant- Wilson, who was sheriff of the county, to assist him, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Earl v. TupperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  3. Hodge v. Town of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  4. Gage v. BarnesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  5. Harris v. HaynesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norman Lumber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Mobile Building & Loan Ass'n v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Gerlach Live Stock Co. v. LaxaltNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Becker-Franz Co. v. Shannon Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  5. Ex parte CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API