Legal Opinion

Seaboyer v. Director General of Railroads

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for the conscious suffering and death of the plaintiff’s intestate, who received mortal injuries on May 31, 1919, through the negligence of one driving an electric truck by backing it with such force against a stationary truck as to cause it to be pushed upon him. The one driving the electric truck was in the employ of the defendant as helper. His testimony showed beyond doubt that in driving the electric truck he was not acting within the scope of his employment by the defendant, that he was merely a helper whose duties were to assist in loading…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartnett v. GryzmishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Fleischner v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Douglas v. Holyoke Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Porcino v. De StefanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Brown v. Jarvis Engineering Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. O'Leary v. FashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Rose v. GisiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kennedy v. Union Charcoal & Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. American Railway Express Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API