Bacot v. Deas
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Keugh, J., Darlington, December, 1902. Action by Agnes Bacot against E. H. Deas. From Circuit order sustaining judgment of magistrate, defendant appeals. No printed argument. cites: As to continuances: 4 Ency. P. & P., 828, 835; 33 S. C., 106, 582; 27 S. C., 80; 19 S. C., 61, 88; 18 S. C., 601; 16 S. C., 459; 38 S. C., 333; 42 S. C., 205. As to cltange of venue: 4 Ency.
Read the full summary
Before Keugh, J., Darlington, December, 1902. Action by Agnes Bacot against E. H. Deas. From Circuit order sustaining judgment of magistrate, defendant appeals. No printed argument. cites: As to continuances: 4 Ency. P. & P., 828, 835; 33 S. C., 106, 582; 27 S. C., 80; 19 S. C., 61, 88; 18 S. C., 601; 16 S. C., 459; 38 S. C., 333; 42 S. C., 205. As to cltange of venue: 4 Ency. P. & P., 408; 56 Cal., 327; 11 Mont., 1; Code Proa, 88, sub. 19; 24 S. C., 107. As to amendments: 13 S. C., 23; 57 S. C., 502; 53 S. C., 222.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
This action for the recovery of the sum of fifty dollars came up in the court of Magistrate Sanders to be tried. Owing to defendant’s sickness, its trial was, on motion, postponed until October 10th, 1902. On that day, the defendant, on an affidavit, on that day filed with the magistrate, and which was served on the 8th day of Octóber, 1902, on plaintiff’s attorney, moved for a change of venue to another magistrate on account of the bias of Magistrate Sanders. The magistrate overruled this motion, thereby denying a change of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BarnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Witte v. CaveSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Gaston v. GastonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Mayes v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Brown Parler v. KolbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.