State v. Crook
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
HOLCOMB, J.,
filed a dissenting opinion, in which JOHNSON and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the concurrent provision of the Texas Penal Code Section 3.03(a) applies to the entire sentence, including fines.
Since 1899, this Court has held that pecuniary fines imposed in separate cases should be cumulated. See Ex Parte Banks, 41 Tex.Crim. 201, 53 S.W. 688 (1899). Accord Ex Parte Williams, 133 Tex.Crim. 116, 109 S.W.2d 171 (1937); Ex Parte Hall, 158 Tex.Crim. 646, 258 S.W.2d 806 (1953); Bristow v. State, 160 Tex. Crim. 111, 267 S.W.2d 415 (1954);…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. ColyandroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Juarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.