Carver v. Teitsworth
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.—
Introduction
In this case a prospective purchaser of real property submitted a sealed bid which stated he would pay “$1,000 more than any other sealed bid.” Although such bids have been severely criticized, as we explain in greater detail below, the record here is not sufficient to determine whether the bid submitted in this case was fatally defective.
Factual and Procedural Background
A. The Bidding
The facts which give rise to the parties’ dispute are for the most part, undisputed. In early September 1988, Robert A. Teitsworth decided to sell four acres of improved property he…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Larwin-Southern California, Inc. v. JGB Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sterling v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Mix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ebel, et al. v. Engelhart, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. McEneryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- Ebel, et al. v. Engelhart, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.