Tice v. Johnson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBierly, C. J.
This was an action instituted by the appellant for damages for loss of a vehicle by the appellees, as bailee. At the conclusion of appellant’s evidence, appellees filed their respective motions for directed verdicts which were sustained by the court.
At the outset appellees argue that this court is without jurisdiction of - this appeal because of a defect in the parties named in the assignment of errors. We .agree with the appellees and feel constrained to set forth our reasons at length due to the uncertainty that exists in this matter. We are aided in our discussion by the cogent arguments…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allmon v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Haney v. Estate of DennyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961
- Indiana Construction Material Co. v. GelopulosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- CITY OF GARY, ETC. v. RubertoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Clemans Truck Lines, Inc. v. VaughnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- CITY OF GARY, ETC. v. RubertoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Clemans Truck Lines, Inc. v. VaughnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966