Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Braun

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2001No. 20000193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] August T. Vogel appealed from a judgment dismissing his action against Mike Braun, Dave Heidt, Barb McGilliv-rary and Steve Boelter. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Vogel’s motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis and Vogel’s failure to participate in oral argument does not require reversal. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Vogel, an inmate at the State Penitentiary, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on February 8, 2000, stating he had $1,184.77 in his “release aid account but this cannot be touched until[ ] his release according to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Syvertson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kautzman v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Patten v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. S.J.F. v. R.C.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lithun v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KoppyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Interest of J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Koenig v. SchuhNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API