Legal Opinion

Individual Damp Wash Laundry Co. v. Meyers

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided February 28, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROUDEBUSH, J.

This matter comes before the court on an application for temporary injunction.

The amended petition states that the plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of laundrying clothes and linens and that the defendant is an individual and former employee of the plaintiff and that on the 29th day of July, 1926, the plaintiff entered into a contract of employment with the defendant as follows:

“Agreement made this 29th day of July, 1926, by and between The Individual Damp Wash Laundry Company, a corporaion organized under the laws of Ohio, its successors and assigns,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. District of Columbia v. HuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vocke v. Third National Bank & Trust Co.City of Dayton Municipal Court · 1971
  2. Lakewood Manufacturing Co. v. Home Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  3. Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API