Legal Opinion

Elmore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1988No. 15199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Judge.

Movant Gerald A. Elmore appeals from an order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 27.261 motion to set aside a judgment and two consecutive three-year sentences for forgery.

Movant’s first point is that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing, and the trial court erred in ruling otherwise, because his motion adequately pleaded that his guilty pleas to both counts of the two-count information were entered through duress caused by ineffective assistance of counsel in four respects: (a) counsel did not file a motion for discovery of evidence; (b) counsel waived…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ahart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API