Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Mitchell-Crittenden Tie Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Navarro County; I-I. B. Daviss, Judge. Action by the Mitchell-Crittenden Tie Company against the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

The facts in this case are undisputed, and in order to determine this appeal it is necessary to relate only the following: Appellee is a corporation engaged in the sale and manufacture of cross-ties. Appellant is a common carrier. Prior to June 6, 1907, there was an existing contract between appellant and appellee by which appellee was to furnish appellant certain cross-ties at agreed prices. This contract expired November 1, 1907. Appellant required more ties, and appellee had them for sale, and both parties desired to enter into a contract similar to the one then in existence to cover a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Wells-Fargo Express Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Weaver v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Tyrrell & Garth Inv. Co. v. American Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API