Legal Opinion

Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the West

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2007No. 76973-7Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*611¶35 (concurring in the dissent) — I agree with the majority that there is no language in the performance bond that requires Colorado Structures, Inc. (Structures) to “formally” declare a default or terminate the subcontract as a condition precedent to Insurance Company of the West’s (West) liability under the bond. But I disagree with the majority’s holding that Structures had no legal obligation to declare a default at all. The majority dispenses with the declaration of default requirement after erroneously equating it with termination of the subcontract. In doing so, the majority renders…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Great American Insurance Co. v. North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API