Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Foshee v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1980No. CA 79-178Published

1ConcurrenceDavid Newbern, Judge

I agree Arkansas law permits a tenant by the entireties to convey her share of the estate. Franks v. Wood, 217 Ark. 10, 228 S.W. 2d 480 (1950). That does not mean that in every case in which a tenant by the entireties signs an agreement to sell the agreement is subject to specific .performance. It must be clear, as in the case before us, that it was her intent to agree to convey the property regardless whether her spouse agreed or not. The acts of Greta Foshee subsequent to the signing of the contract indicate that was her intent. Had it, on the other hand, been clear that she intended to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roulston v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. Franks v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Hood v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API