Legal Opinion

Bank Line Ltd. v. The Rio Atuel

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 18, 1951No. 18633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, Chief Judge.

This is an action by The Bank Line Limited, as owner of the steamship Holly-bank, to recover damages sustained by the *524Hollybank when allegedly, in order to avoid a collision with the steamship Rio Atuel, it was compelled to go aground in the Cape Cod Canal on the early morning of October 31, 1947.

At that time both ships were being piloted by duly licensed Federal Coast Pilots; and were proceeding in opposite directions in the Cape Cod Canal. Both were large freight vessels, the Hollybank being 431 feet long between perpendiculars with a beam of 56.3 feet, and the Rio Atuel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bouchard Transp. Co. v. Conners Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Reiss Steamship Co. v. The ClaremontDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank Line Limited v. The Steamship Rio AtuelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Oil Transfer Corp. v. The CreeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API