Thalia S. ex rel. Gromacki v. Progressive Select Insurance
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, A.J.
In this dispute over insurance coverage, Appellants argue the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Progressive Select Insurance Company (Progressive) because (1) their insurance policy affords bodily injury liability coverage pursuant to section 56-9-351 of the South Carolina Code (2006) and (2) the trial court’s reliance on Newton v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company, 347 S.C. 271, 554 S.E.2d 437 (Ct.App.2001), is misplaced. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case are undisputed. On March 22, 2005, Kristopher Gromacki was driving his wife, Mercedes Salas, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Contravest Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017