Legal Opinion

Commercial Corp. v. NY Barge Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 17, 1941No. 14PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

314 U.S. 104 (1941)

COMMERCIAL MOLASSES CORP.

v.

NEW YORK TANK BARGE CORP.

No. 14.

Supreme Court of United States.

Reargued October 16, 1941.

Decided November 17, 1941.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Mr. T. Catesby Jones, with whom Messrs. Leonard J. Matteson and Ezra G. Benedict Fox were on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. Robert S. Erskine, with whom Messrs. Cletus Keating, L. de Grove Potter, and Richard Sullivan were on the brief, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · StoneChief Justice Stone

This is a proceeding in admiralty originating in the District Court upon a petition by respondent, as chartered owner of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stegemann v. Miami Beach Boat Slips, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Adelman v. M & S Welding Shop, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. O. F. Nelson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. EAC Timberlane v. Pisces, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
  5. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. American Coastal Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API