Hausman v. Herdtfelder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Elizabeth Herdtfelder, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of' March, 1902, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order-entered in said clerk’s office on the 11th day of August, 1902, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes..
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
The plaintiff has recovered a verdict for $620 commissions on the theory that he obtained a purchaser for the premises owned by the defendant known as Nos. 168 and 170 Orchard street, in the city of New York, situate on the southeast corner of. Orchard and Stanton streets, the dimensions being fifty feet front by sixty-six feet in depth. The premises were occupied by two old houses-, of little value. The plaintiff was quite familiar with the neighborhood and property. The defendant was seventy-three years of age and resided at 417 East One Hundred and Sixteenth streets * The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Curtiss v. MottNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- C. H. Diamond & Co. v. HartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Little v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Wiggins v. Estate of CoddingtonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
- Sotsky v. GinsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Blase v. PalmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
- Gordon v. RosenthalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.