Legal Opinion
Johnson v. GEICO Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 11, 2009No. C.A. 06-408-JJFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants GEICO Casualty Company’s And GEICO General Insurance Company’s Rule 12(B)(1) Motion To Dismiss Claims For Lack Of Standing (D.I. 194) and Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave To Amend First Amended Complaint (D.I. 225). For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant both motions.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Kerry Johnson and Sharon Anderson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initially filed this proposed class action lawsuit on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Defendants GEICO Casualty Company…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kuhn Construction Co. v. Ocean & Coastal Consultants, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kuhn Construction Co. v. Ocean & Coastal Consultants, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Johnson v. GEICO Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- DEARDORFF v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.