Legal Opinion

Ferns v. American Moore Peg Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The court in construing P. S., c. 141, ss. 9 and 17, holds that one to whom s. 9 gives a lien can preserve it by suit, but to do that he must (1) state in his writ the purpose for which the suit is brought, s. 17; (2) describe the property on which he claims the lien with reasonable accuracy, Hill v. Callahan, 58 N. H. 497; and (3) direct the officer to attach it to preserve his lien, Wason v. Martel, 68 N. H. 560. While the plaintiffs stated in their writ that the suit was “brought for the purpose of securing a mechanic’s lien,” they did neither of the other things the court holds they must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. CallahanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
  2. Wason v. MartelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gothic Metal Lathing v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Mathers v. ConnellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API