Fedel v. Miller
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County
Replevin. Rule to show cause why judgment should not be entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. C. P. Jefferson Co., Aug. T., 1921, No. 190.
1Opinion of the Court
Corbet, P. J.,
Replevin for numerous articles of household goods and chattels. The goods were replevied and the defendants duly served. They filed no counter-bond within the prescribed time, and the goods were delivered and turned over to the plaintiff.
Plaintiff in her declaration avers, among other things, that “all of which articles of personal property belong to and are owned by the said Cornelia Fedel, the plaintiff, who purchased them with her own funds.” This was all *706that was necessary: McCrary v. McCully, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 464; Commercial Car Co. v. W. H. Murphy & Sons, 50 Pa. C. C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Painter v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- C. H. Hardy Auto Co. v. PoseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- McCrary v. McCullySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.