Legal Opinion
Gray v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This matter was originally marked off the Trial Calendar on May 24, 1983, because discovery had not been completed. The plaintiff made two attempts to restore the case in May and August 1984. The first motion was denied because physical and psychiatric examinations of the plaintiff had still not been conducted. The second motion was denied with leave to renew upon the appointment of a personal representative of the recently deceased defendant Morris Woodrow. All activity in the action stopped on October 27, 1986, with this court’s affirmance of the denial of the third-party defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tucker v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Pirnak v. SavinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Condurso v. ThumsudenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Gray v. Sandoz PharmaceuticalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Civello v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Robinson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Kopilas v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Knight v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hewitt v. Booth Memorial Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.