Legal Opinion · Dissent

People Ex Rel. Neilson v. Wilkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1980No. 12893Published

1DissentBakes, Justice

Sixty years ago the Supreme Court of Idaho had this to say about the predecessor to I.C. § 6-602: “This is not a quo warranto proceeding under the common law. It is usually called a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto . . .” People v. Burnham, 35 Idaho 522, 525, 207 P. 589, 590 (1922). Such being the case, we should *397think twice before defeating a claim brought pursuant to I.C. § 6-602 solely on the basis of the technical nuances of the antiquated writ of quo warranto. Indeed, in Taylor v. Beneficial Protective Ass’n, 60 Idaho 587, 94 P.2d 787 (1939), we held that some of the procedural…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. BurnhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Jordan v. PearceIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bradfield v. AvertIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. KeiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API