Legal Opinion

Erace v. Erace

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 16, 1997No. Nos. 96-2645, 96-2612PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Joseph Erace appeals from a trial court order denying three motions. One of the appellant’s motions was for leave to amend and join additional parties; two of the motions were for reconsideration and re hearing of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the order of the trial court is reversed.

The trial court abused its discretion when it denied the appellant’s motion to amend the complaint and to join additional parties. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(a)(“Leave of court shall be given freely when justice so requires.”); Surface v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands, 625 So.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suggs v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. McCutcheon v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Surface v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Erace v. EraceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prescott v. StanleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API