Legal Opinion

Gell-Tejada v. Macy's Retail Holding, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered September 17, 2013, which denied the motion of defendants Mainco Elevator & Electrical Co. and ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation (collectively ThyssenKrupp) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them and on their cross claims for contractual and common-law indemnification against defendant Macy’s Retail Holding Inc. (Macy’s), unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion to the extent of dismissing the complaint and all cross-claims as against ThyssenKrupp, and otherwise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Santoni v. Bertelsmann Property, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Parris v. Port of New York AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Luciano v. Deco Towers Associates LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Espinoza v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API