Legal Opinion

D.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 7, 2003No. 3D03-1767PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Confession of Error

2Per curiam

D.B. petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking release from home detention care with an electronic monitor. In its response, the State confesses error. The State acknowledges that D.B. does not qualify for home detention based on the risk assessment instrument. See § 985.213(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). The statute permits a more restrictive placement than that indicated by the risk assessment instrument, but to do so, “the court shall state, in writing, clear and convincing reasons for such placement.” Id. § 985.215(2)(j). No such reasons were given in this case.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. R.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. INTEREST OF DGH v. GnatDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. K.C. v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. KE v. Department of Juvenile JusticeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. C.D.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. KM v. Department of Juvenile JusticeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. T.D.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. FH v. DobulerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API