Legal Opinion

State v. Pinkard

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2005No. 4006Published

1Opinion of the Court

KITTREDGE, J.:

In this criminal appeal, we are asked to decide whether a defendant forfeits his right to make the final closing argument to the jury when he offers only non-testimonial evidence. Brandon Pinkard was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. On appeal, Pinkard claims error in the trial court’s ruling that his proposed display of a tattoo to the jury would constitute evidence, thereby depriving him of the right to make the last argument. We affirm and hold the presentation of any evidence by a defendant — whether characterized as testimonial or non-testimonial — forfeits his right to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GellisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. MouzonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. RodgersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. HartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API