Legal Opinion

Russell v. McPherson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 28, 1918No. 3 Div. 320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Probate Court, Lowndes County; J. O. Wood, Judge. In the matter of the estate of W. P. Russell, deceased. From a decree on the final settlement of the executors, H. H. McPherson and others, an appeal is prosecuted by W. P. Russell, as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed, and others.

1Opinion of the Court

PER GURIAM.

The appeal is from a decree of the probate court on the final settlement of the executors of the last will of W. P. Russell. One of the executors I-I. I-I. McPherson resigned, and the settlement was liad with the administrator de bonis non with the will annexed, and the legatees, devisees, and other interested parties. The appeal is prosecuted by W. P. Russell, as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed, the legatees, devisees, etc.

The main insistences as to errors to r& verse go to the allowance by the court of certain credits to the executors; one as for an attorney’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kirksey v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  2. Clarke v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  3. McGowan v. MilnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Gordon v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Smith's Distributees v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollis v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Bivin v. MillsapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Jones v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API