Legal Opinion

Kirwan v. United States National Bank

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1896No. 36PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum. — Error from Atchison district court; Robert M. Eaton, judge. Action by E. F. Kirwan and others, partners as Kirwan & Tyler, against The United States National Bank. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings the case to this court.

Read the full summary

Memorandum. — Error from Atchison district court; Robert M. Eaton, judge. Action by E. F. Kirwan and others, partners as Kirwan & Tyler, against The United States National Bank. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings the case to this court. The statement of the case, as made by Gtlkeson, P. J., is as follows : The plaintiffs in error, for some years prior to 1889, and. during the times of the transactions herein complained of, were engaged in the manufacture and selling of fruit-cans in Baltimore, Md. The United States National Bank was at the same time a banking corporation at Atchison,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gilkeson, P. J. :

The cause of action set forth in the plaintiffs’ petition is for money had and received ; that the defendant bank had collected the draft mentioned, and failed, neglected and refused to turn the proceeds thereof over to them. This is denied by the *691defendant in error as one of its defenses, and as a further defense, it claims that it delivered the car of cans in compliance with the letter accompanying the draft, and if there was any mistake made it was an honest mistake on its part, and it was justified in doing as it did under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Mushrush v. ZarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. German American National Bank v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API