Legal Opinion

Salley v. Board of Governors

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1991No. C-89-438-WSPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RUSSELL A. ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and to determine the sufficiency of defendants’ objections to that discovery. It presents an issue of first impression, to wit: whether a telephonic facsimile transmission satisfies the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b) for the service of discovery requests.

On July 4, 1990, plaintiff served defendants with Requests for Admissions and a Supplemental Request for Production of Documents. Plaintiff served these documents using a telephonic facsimile transmission…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jose Rivera v. M/t FossarinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Timmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John Magnuson, D/B/A John Magnuson Associates, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Video Yesteryear, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. RFR Industries, Inc. v. Century Steps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. GaliczynskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. United States v. CroslandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  5. Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API