Legal Opinion
Austin Investment Fund, LLC v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 8, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-2300PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs [75] Motion to Set Aside Order of Dismissal. Upon consideration of the pleadings 1 , the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion. Accordingly, this action is REINSTATED. The parties shall adhere to the schedule set out in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
I. BACKGROUND
On May 16, 2011, Austin Investment Fund, by and through individuals Bruce Elieff and Kathy Abrahamson, filed a [1] Petition for Review of Final Partnership…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Edouard Legille v. C. Marshall Dann, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- In Re Vitamins Antitrust Class ActionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oladokun v. Correctional Treatment FacilityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Gable v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018