Legal Opinion · Dissent

Byus v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1996No. 81340Published

1DissentSummers, Justice

I do not believe this automobile policy insuring against injuries inflicted by an uninsured motorist contemplated additional coverage for gunshot injuries. I dissent for the reasons explained in Willard v. Kelley, 808 P.2d 1124, 1135 (Okla.1990), (Summers, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bingham v. McArthurCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991