Legal Opinion · Dissent
Byus v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 1996No. 81340Published
1DissentSummers, Justice
I do not believe this automobile policy insuring against injuries inflicted by an uninsured motorist contemplated additional coverage for gunshot injuries. I dissent for the reasons explained in Willard v. Kelley, 808 P.2d 1124, 1135 (Okla.1990), (Summers, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bingham v. McArthurCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991