Legal Opinion

United States v. De La Cruz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2013No. 11-5114PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

In this direct criminal appeal, Defendant-Appellant Enrique De La Cruz challenges the district court’s decision to deny his motion to suppress evidence the United States obtained during an investigative seizure. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we REVERSE the denial of De La Cruz’s suppression motion.

I. BACKGROUND

The evidence presented at the suppression hearing, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, see United States v. Hunter, 663 F.3d 1136, 1141 (10th Cir.2011), established the following: On Sunday morning, February 13, 2011, three Immigration…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Donahue v. WihongiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Courtney v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. ShrumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Davila v. Northern Regional Joint Police BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API